Call us irresponsible, delusional, stupid, whatever you’d like. We’re going out on a limb and, to borrow an Australian turn of phrase, having a go. In this case, a go at wild speculation. So bear with us. It should be fun.
Our wild speculation involves former Angel Garret Anderson.
For the last few seasons, “G.A.” has been a love-him-or-hate-him type of player. Simply, as his power numbers declined, his anemic on base percentage began to irritate most Angel fans. Since he long ago became the poster child for ridicule among SABRmetric loyalists, his statistical regression has neither endeared him to Angel fans nor kept him gainfully employed.
But we think that’s about to change (well, at least in regard to the latter). And, yes, we have (strictly anecdotal) evidence. While some columnists are willing to risk their reputation by quoting “anonymous” sources, we’re willing to risk ours with far less, admitting that we’re just blowing (educated) hot air for the mere sake of it. So here goes:
Back in December, shortly after acquiring Matt Holliday, the Oakland A’s were rumored to be interested in Garret Anderson. Since then, the story has failed to gain legs, leaving many to believe that Billy Beane has no interest in a player that is commonly considered antithetical to A’s baseball.
But we here at 3DoC think that something strange is about to happen up north.
We know that Garret Anderson and Mark McGwire are neighbors in Shady Canyon, the highly exclusive Irvine golf enclave, and we know that McGwire is a respected, but quiet, hitting coach. We’ve also recently learned that McGwire is working with Matt Holliday and Bobby Crosby. Now, a couple of days ago we shared with you a story that Garret Anderson is building a friendship, and working out, with new A’s slugger Matt Holliday (and others referred to by Garret only as “the guys”). What’s going on here?
Well, transitively, it would seem that Garret and a gaggle of A’s are convening to hit (insert HGH/steroid joke here).
As if all of that weren’t damning enough, Garret is busy winning over A’s fans by sending autographs through the mail (okay, we admit it, we’re reaching there, but still…).
We think that Garret’s price, as it falls, is becoming increasingly appealing to a small market team like the A’s. An incentive-laden, one-year, free agent deal offered to Garret could be a great fit for both parties, especially if Garret’s being endorsed by both McGwire and Holliday.
Garret gets a chance to prove himself relatively close to home. The A’s take a cheap flier on a guy who’s always hit well in Oakland, who’s in the best shape of his career, and who would probably love nothing more at this point than to exact some revenge upon the team for which he might harbor some unspoken ill-will.
So, yes, we are actively predicting that Garret Anderson will become an Oakland Athletic….and soon. Now, who have we upset more here, Angel fans or A’s fans?
9 Comments
January 26, 2009 at 6:14 pm
[...] Over at 3 Days this morning, a question: Is Garret Anderson going to sign with the Green and Gold? [...]
January 27, 2009 at 12:53 am
Impressive!
January 27, 2009 at 1:41 am
Thanks Matt. And thanks, too, for reading.
February 3, 2009 at 1:31 am
[...] We, however, still insist that G.A. will land with the A’s. [...]
February 2, 2009 at 5:49 pm
[...] however, still insist that G.A. will land with the A’s. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Off To a Good Start: Thanks, SeattleMariners [...]
February 4, 2009 at 2:36 pm
[...] 2. It opens up more room in the outfield. Might the A’s be making room to make a run at Bobby Abreu or Garret Anderson? Probably less likely, as the A’s make up for a lack of quality with quantity in the outfield. But it’s possible. [...]
February 7, 2009 at 11:40 am
[...] Boras negotiation is complete without ”another team.” If Boras really has been negotiating with the Oakland A’s on Garret’s behalf, he needs at least one other team to drive up [...]
February 11, 2009 at 7:43 am
[...] This signing also assures that Garret Anderson’s days with the Angels are over and will likely hasten the signing of G.A. by a division rival (either Seattle or Oakland). [...]
March 30, 2009 at 7:03 pm
[...] not normally much for predictions, seeing as though we’re essentially 0 for 1, but we think 85 wins is an underestimation; the Angels will win 92 games this [...]